Gutfeld: GLAAD’s Beef With ‘Red Eye’

So GLAAD, that stands for Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation - and too makers of a pretty amazing trash bag - netmailed me over our segment on Thomas Beattie, the madam passing herself off as the first meaning man.

We named them back, and they existed pretty upset with us. We speedily invited GLAAD to be on the display, but they articulated no. Perhaps it’s because only homophiles and tribades are the unities that matter, that is prettied intolerant if you inquire me.

At any rate, all this ridiculous outrage about Beattie hasn’t even stirred on what we emphasised. See, we said the the true and nabbed the culture mediums on their cowardliness - that career a “she” a “he” only industrial plant if “he” ain’t significant. Because of this, we’ve existed maligned by humourless creeps who only champion permissiveness if you concur with them. If non, then they want you dead. One furious person told I have badded breath, but it was in all probability an old houseboy who’s still huffy I Ate one of his auricles.

But here’s the affair: If GLAAD says Thomas is an adult male, then he’s truly straight - and GLAAD has no reason to fend for him. But if they do support him, then they’re locution he’s an adult female who likes adult females, which way “Red Eye” is compensated. But genuinely this contestation only lives in the headed minds of citizenry who fear biological science, as well as those Sir Noel Pierce Cowards scared that they will be realized as minded.

Seriously citizenry, you’re travelling to have got to do better than career me ungenerous. Try explicating why you think Beattie is an adult male. The victor gets a free date with me, in genu pads (we’re locomoting rollerblading!).

Greg Gutfeld hosts “Red Eye with Greg Gutfeld” weekdays at 2 a.m. ET. Direct your comments to:
redeye flight@foxnews.com

Post a Comment
*Required
*Required (Never published)